B-PL-PINN: Stabilizing PINN Training with Bayesian Pseudo Labeling
Kevin Innerebner, Franz M. Rohrhofer, Bernhard C. Geiger
arXiv:2507.01714·cs.LG·Published 2025-07-02
Training physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for forward problems often suffers from severe convergence issues, hindering the propagation of information from regions where the desired solution is well-defined. Haitsiukevich and Ilin (2023) proposed an ensemble approach that extends the active training domain of each PINN based on i) ensemble consensus and ii) vicinity to (pseudo-)labeled points, thus ensuring that the information from the initial condition successfully propagates to the interior of the computational domain. In this work, we suggest replacing the ensemble by a Bayesian PINN, and consensus by an evaluation of the PINN's posterior variance. Our experiments show that this mathematically principled approach outperforms the ensemble on a set of benchmark problems and is competitive with PINN ensembles trained with combinations of Adam and LBFGS.
TopicsScientific Machine Learning & PINNs
Tagsphysics-informed-neural-networks pinns
arXiv categoriescs.LG
arXiv abstract pagePDF