Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from the cross-correlation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies and $Planck$ CMB lensing
J. R. Bermejo-Climent, R. Demina, A. Krolewski, E. Chaussidon, M. Rezaie, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Macorra, Arjun Dey, P. Doel, G. Farren, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, C. Hahn, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, R. Kehoe, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, M. Landriau, L. Le Guillou, M. E. Levi, M. Manera, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, J. A. Newman, G. Niz, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, W. J. Percival, F. Prada, I. Pérez-Ràfols, D. Rabinowitz, A. J. Ross, G. Rossi, E. Sanchez, D. Schlegel, D. Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, B. A. Weaver, M. White, C. Yèche, P. Zarrouk
arXiv:2412.10279·astro-ph.CO·Published 2024-12-13·Updated 2025-05-12
We use the angular cross-correlation between a luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Legacy Survey data release DR9 and the $Planck$ cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing maps to constrain the local primordial non-Gaussianity parameter, $f_{\rm NL}$, using the scale-dependent galaxy bias effect. The galaxy sample covers approximately 40\% of the sky, contains galaxies up to redshift $z \sim 1.4$, and is calibrated with the LRG spectra that have been observed for DESI Year 1 (Y1). We apply a nonlinear imaging systematics treatment based on neural networks to remove observational effects that could potentially bias the $f_{\rm NL}$ measurement. Our measurement is performed without blinding, but the full analysis pipeline is tested with simulations including systematics. Using the two-point angular cross-correlation between LRG and CMB lensing only ($C_\ell^{κG}$) we find $f_{\rm NL} = 39_{-38}^{+40}$ at 68% confidence level, and our result is robust in terms of systematics and cosmology assumptions. If we combine this information with the autocorrelation of LRG ($C_\ell^{GG}$) applying a $\ell_{\rm min}$ scale cut to limit the impact of systematics, we find $f_{\rm NL} = 24_{-21}^{+20}$ at 68% confidence level. Our results motivate the use of CMB lensing cross-correlations for measuring $f_{\rm NL}$ with future datasets given its stability in terms of observational systematics compared to the angular auto-correlation. Furthermore, performing accurate systematics mitigation is crucially important in order to achieve competitive constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ from CMB lensing cross-correlation in combination with the tracers' autocorrelation.
TopicsAstrophysics & Cosmology
Tagscosmology dark-energy
arXiv categoriesastro-ph.CO
arXiv abstract pagePDF