HonestAffinity: Leak-Aware Evaluation of Protein and Pocket Priors for Binding Affinity Prediction

Junhao Wei, Baili Lu, Zhenhong Peng, Wanyan Li, Zhirong Huang, Yanxiao Li, Yifu Zhao, Dexing Yao, Haochen Li, Xudong Ye, Sio-Kei Im, Yapeng Wang, Xu Yang

arXiv:2606.03422·cs.CE·Published 2026-06-02

Sequence-based deep learning offers a scalable alternative to structure-based scoring for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction. However, progress is hard to interpret when architectural priors are evaluated on canonical PDBbind-style splits that leak similarity classes across folds. We present HonestAffinity, a compact 1D-input predictor to isolate two priors under a leak-aware protocol: frozen ESM-2 (650M) protein embeddings and a learned binary pocket-position marker. We evaluate a multi-scale convolutional/Transformer template in three variants: HonestAffinity-Pocket, HonestAffinity-NoPocket, and HonestAffinity-Pocket-NoESM. All three train on 11,513 LP-PDBBind complexes in ~3 GPU-hours. We benchmark against five baselines on the LP-PDBBind 3-tier no-leak hold-out, CASF-2016, and a CASF-2016 non-train subset. Our central finding is a split-conditioned reversal rather than a uniformly best prior: HonestAffinity-Pocket achieves the best mean Pearson R on validation and CASF-2016 splits, whereas HonestAffinity-Pocket-NoESM achieves the best mean Pearson R on every strict LP no-leak tier (test_cl1-cl3). Both the pocket marker and ESM-2 input improve performance on familiar splits but reduce Pearson R on strict no-leak tiers. We argue models should report paired canonical and leak-proof ablations, and that deployment-regime-matched variants better describe these reversals than a single default. Code and scripts are linked in the footnote; checkpoints will be released upon acceptance.

TopicsProperty Prediction & ADMET

Tagsprotein-ligand

arXiv categoriescs.CE

arXiv abstract pagePDF